Skip to Content
Top
Retaliation For Asserting Protected LGBT Rights

Retaliation for Asserting Protected LGBTQ Rights Attorneys in New York

New York City Lawyers Knowledgeable in Gender Discrimination Claims

Many employers have created workplace environments that foster equality for individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ). Unfortunately, all too many employers harbor prejudicial and biased beliefs against LGBTQ individuals. In some instances, these beliefs lead employers to engage in harassment, discrimination, and even wrongful termination, particularly after the employee has asserted one of his or her many LGBTQ rights under New York state law. At Phillips & Associates, our New York City attorneys can help employees pursue compensation for retaliation based on asserting their rights against sexual orientation discrimination. We can advise you on your options after being wrongfully terminated or suffering another adverse employment action.

Establishing the Liability of an Employer

The same laws that protect employees from discrimination and harassment also protect employees from facing retaliation from their employers after asserting one of these rights. Although there are no clear federal laws that protect individuals based on sexual orientation, New York has enacted a number of protections for these individuals, including measures that make it unlawful to discriminate or harass an employee based on his or her actual or perceived sexual orientation.

In general, retaliation happens when an employer punishes an employee for engaging in a legally protected activity. The punishment can include demotions, discipline, salary reduction, job reassignments, and firing. These are some of the most obvious examples of retaliation, and when paired with a statement or written communication from the employer indicating that he or she is taking that action based on the employee’s decision to exercise his or her rights, there is usually clear liability.

Recognizing retaliation can be difficult in some cases, such as when it is not always obvious that the employer’s action was negative or that the employer took that action based on the employee’s participation in a legally protected activity. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, in these instances a court must consider the totality of the circumstances in the situation. For example, changing an employee’s job shift assignment may not seem like retaliation on the surface. If that employee has young children who require supervision at night or on the weekends and the employer is aware of that, however, the action may constitute retaliation.

A court will also consider the effect that the employer’s retaliatory act had on other employees in the work environment. For example, if the action would deter a reasonable person from making a complaint or speaking with a supervisor about other incidents of harassment and discrimination, the action is most likely considered retaliatory.

Discuss Your Retaliation Case with a New York City Attorney

If you suspect that you have suffered retaliation for asserting one of your protected LGBTQ rights, you should speak with a human resources representative or supervisor in your company immediately about the situation. If your employer cannot give you a legitimate reason for the action, it is important to speak with a sexual orientation discrimination lawyer. At Phillips & Associates, we can assist New York City residents with investigating potential retaliation claims and bringing lawsuits against their employers. We represent individuals throughout the five boroughs, including in Staten Island, the Bronx, and Brooklyn. We offer a free no-obligation consultation, so you have nothing to lose. Call us now at (866) 229-9441 or contact us online to set up an appointment.

Discrimination Lawyer Success

MORE THAN $150 MILLION RECOVERED FOR PAST CLIENTS
  • $1.8 Million Race Discrimination

    Jesse S. Weinstein and Gregory W. Kirschenbaum successfully obtained a $1,800,000 unanimous jury verdict in the Southern District of New York on behalf of Plaintiff, John Pardovani. The verdict consisted of $800,000 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages.

  • $280 Thousand Race Discrimination

    In a race discrimination case, a federal jury in New York found that use of the N-word in the workplace is never acceptable, even when used between black coworkers.

  • $2.2 Million Race Discrimination & Retaliation

    Greg Kirschenbaum was part of the trial team that won a $2.2 million verdict in a race discrimination and retaliation case in 2015. Rosas v. Balter Sales, et al.

  • $1.4 Million Religious & Sexual Orientation Discrimination

    Bryan Arce was part of the trial team that won a $1.4 million-dollar verdict in a religious and sexual orientation discrimination case brought by a Chef, which was the highest employment law verdict in 2012.