In today's fast-paced retail environment, where irregular schedules are the norm, a recent lawsuit against Kohl's Department Stores highlights a critical issue: the failure to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities. The case, brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of former employee Pamela Manning, underscores how seemingly routine management decisions can cross into illegal territory under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). As discrimination lawyers specializing in employment law, we've seen firsthand how such oversights not only harm individuals but also expose companies to significant legal risks. This isn't just a news story—it's a wake-up call for employees facing similar challenges to act swiftly and secure their rights.
The Kohl's Case: A Stark Example of Alleged ADA Violations
Pamela Manning, a diabetic employee at a Kohl's store in Westbrook, Maine, claims the retailer forced her to quit by abruptly shifting her from a stable, regular schedule to an erratic one. According to the EEOC lawsuit filed in August in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, Manning repeatedly informed her managers of her need for consistent hours to manage her insulin injections and avoid life-threatening complications. She even provided a doctor's note emphasizing the medical necessity. Yet, her store manager reportedly dismissed her concerns with laughter and denied the request, while granting scheduling flexibility to other employees for non-medical reasons like childcare.
Kohl's has denied the allegations, asserting that its decisions were based on legitimate business needs unrelated to Manning's condition. The company claims it made good-faith efforts to accommodate her and argues that a fixed schedule wasn't reasonable. This defense is common in disability discrimination cases, but it raises key questions: What constitutes a "reasonable accommodation," and when does an employer's refusal amount to discrimination?
As employment discrimination attorneys, we view this case as emblematic of a broader pattern. In fiscal year 2011 alone, the EEOC received nearly 100,000 charges of discrimination, with disability-related claims surging to over 25,000—making up more than 25% of all filings. This spike reflects growing awareness of ADA protections, but it also signals that many employers are still falling short. If you're experiencing erratic scheduling or denied accommodations due to a medical condition, time is of the essence—statutes of limitations for filing EEOC charges are as short as 180 days in some jurisdictions.
Understanding ADA Obligations: Employer Duties and Employee Rights
The ADA, enacted in 1990, applies to employers with 15 or more employees and prohibits discrimination based on disability in hiring, firing, promotions, and other job aspects. At its core is the requirement for "reasonable accommodations"—modifications that enable qualified individuals with disabilities to perform essential job functions without undue hardship on the employer.
In the Kohl's scenario, a predictable schedule for insulin management likely qualifies as reasonable, especially since the company accommodated others for personal needs. Employers must engage in an "interactive process" to explore options, not dismiss requests outright. Failure to do so can lead to lawsuits seeking back pay, compensatory damages, and even punitive penalties.
But federal law is just the baseline. In New York, where our firm Phillips & Associates operates as one of the leading discrimination law practices, state and local protections go further. The New York State Human Rights Law covers employers with four or more employees, while the New York City Human Rights Law offers even broader definitions of disability and requires accommodations unless they pose an undue hardship. These laws provide stronger shields against bias, often allowing for higher damages and easier proof of claims.
As workplace lawyers, we advise: Don't assume your employer knows the law. Document every interaction—emails, notes from meetings, and medical documentation. If denied, escalate internally before it's too late.
5 Signs Your Employer May Be Violating Your ADA Rights
To empower employees, here are key red flags drawn from ADA rights violations cases like Kohl's:
- Denied Accommodations Without Dialogue: If your request for adjustments (e.g., modified hours for medical treatments) is rejected without discussion, it may violate the interactive process.
- Inconsistent Treatment: Accommodations granted to non-disabled colleagues but not you? This could indicate discriminatory intent.
- Health-Related Harassment: Mockery or dismissive attitudes toward your condition, as alleged in Manning's case, may create a hostile work environment.
- Sudden Schedule Changes Impacting Health: Abrupt shifts that exacerbate your disability without alternatives signal potential bias.
- Retaliation for Complaints: If you're demoted, isolated, or terminated after raising concerns, you may have a retaliation claim alongside discrimination.
Recognizing these signs early is crucial. Delaying action can weaken your case, as evidence fades and deadlines loom.
Steps to Take If You Suspect Disability Discrimination
Act now—here's a streamlined guide from our team of labor lawyers:
- Document Everything: Keep records of incidents, requests, and responses.
- Request in Writing: Formalize your accommodation needs with supporting medical info.
- File with the EEOC: Submit a charge promptly; in New York, you have up to 300 days for federal claims, but local laws vary.
- Seek Expert Counsel: Consult a disability discrimination attorney near you for a free evaluation. At Phillips & Associates, we offer free consultations to assess your situation and outline options, often working on contingency to minimize upfront costs.
A Call for Vigilance: Protecting Your Rights
The Kohl's case isn't isolated—it's a symptom of systemic issues in industries like retail, where flexibility often trumps employee well-being. As thought leaders in employment law, we at Phillips & Associates emphasize that proactive enforcement of the ADA not only protects individuals but fosters fairer workplaces. With disability claims at record highs this year, employers must prioritize compliance, and employees must demand accountability.
If you're facing workplace discrimination based on a disability, don't let your rights slip away. Contact Phillips & Associates today for a free consultation with an experienced employment lawyer. We're here to fight for you—because every day without action is a day your case grows weaker. Call us now at 866-229-9441 to learn more.